Never miss an MBA/BBA update again
  • Home
  • MAH MBA CET 2026 Day 3 Analysis - Section-Wise Breakdown and Topic Details

MAH MBA CET 2026 Day 3 Analysis - Section-Wise Breakdown and Topic Details

MAH MBA CET 2026 Day 3 was of a moderate difficulty level with time pressure. The hardest section was the Logical Reasoning while the Abstract Reasoning was the easiest. Quantitative Ability involved heavy calculations. Reading Comprehension was based on vocabulary and tone in VARC.

Table of Content

  • + more items Show less

Overview of Day 3 MAH BBA CET 2026 Exam 

The difficulty level of the MAH MBA CET 2026 Day 3 was higher compared to Day 1 and Day 2. The questions were of moderate difficulty level and students faced some kind of time pressure while solving questions from the LR and QA sections. The exam was still speed-based which means they had to move fast and smart. 

Section in MHT CET MBA 

Difficulty level 

Questions

QA - Quantitative Aptitude

Easy to Average 

50

LR - Logical Reasoning

Average 

75

VARC - Verbal Ability & Logical Reasoning 

Average 

50

AR - Abstract Reasoning

Average 

25

Total

Average 

200

MAH MBA CET 2026 Day 3 Analysis

MAH MBA CET 2026 Day 3 Section-Wise Breakdown - Slot 1 & 2 Overall Analysis

Day 3 Analysis of VARC Section

  • Verbal Ability - The questions on vocabulary were hard in nature as the options were too close making it difficult to reject options.

  • Reading Comprehension - There are four reading comprehension chapters with five questions in each. Topics of the passages included a story, mergers & acquisition, Penguins and one general passage. While two passages were easy, one passage along with its questions was hard especially those questions on the tone of the author.

Thus, this section was of moderate difficulty level which means a little tougher than previous days.

Topics

Questions

Passive & Active 

1

Para Jumbles

1

Correct Usage

2

Indirect & Direct Speech

1

Reading Comprehension had four passages

20

Assumptions & Statements

5

Vocabulary

5-6

Fill in the Blanks

5

Sentence Correction

3

Error Detection

4

Para Completion

3

Total

50

Quantitative Aptitude Analysis of Day 3

This part was easy to moderate in difficulty level but the lengthy calculations made it very time-consuming. Most of the questions relied on fundamental mathematical ideas. There was hardly any advanced mathematics included in this paper. The DI sets were comprehensible but required many calculations to solve.

Topic

Questions

Ages

1

Mixtures

1

HCF

1

Time & Work

1

Cisterns & Pipes

1

Data Interpretation

10

Distance, Speed & Time 

5

PnC / Probability

3

Number Series

4

Loss & Profit

3

Percentages

4

Mensuration

3

Compound & Simple Interest

2

Miscellaneous Arithmetic

5

Divisibility

1

BODMAS

2

Total

50

Analysis of Day 3 Logical Reasoning Section 

It was the most difficult section of the day as it consisted of lengthy and difficult questions. The previous sections did not contain puzzle-type and Critical Reasoning questions which were included for the first time in the test.

Topic

Questions

Calendar

1

Puzzle-based Questions

2

Divisibility

2

Linear Arrangement

6

Number Series

6

Meaningful Arrangement

5

Input-Output

5

Venn Diagrams

5

Data Sufficiency

5

PnC / Probability

3

Analogy

4

Directions

5

Blood Relations

5

BODMAS

4

Miscellaneous

12-15

DI-based LR

5

Total

75

Note - All questions were individual except for puzzles which were a few and time-consuming while there were I/O questions too.

Day 3 Abstract Reasoning Section Analysis

This turned out to be the easiest section like the last two days. Most students solved 23 to 25 questions without many difficulties.

Questions based on analogies, missing figures, finding the odd one out, series & pattern types were predominant.

Final Takeaway of MAH MBA CET 2026 Day 3 

  • Day 3 of the MAH MBA CET 2026 was more difficult than Day 1 and Day 2 but relatively easier to attempt.

  • Abstract Reasoning was the easiest section and scoring too.

  • VARC required practice for vocabulary and comprehension questions based on tone.

  • Quant had simple concepts but was time-consuming because of numerous calculations.

  • Logical Reasoning was where one would be differentiating oneself and hence consumed much time.

Also Read